0 ZE VS

All posts tagged 0 ZE VS

If I saw something in my viewfinder that looked familiar to me, I would do something to shake it up. – Garry Winogrand

sigma-and-zeiss3

All in 35mm and Black & White this month. Using both my Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 35/2,0 ZE and the Sigma 35 1.4 Art.  So far I think the Zeiss gives better image quality. The Sigma’s AF is sometimes a very good thing to have – so will use this lens a lot now to see if it is a keeper for me or if it ends up for sale.

_____________________________________ Sigma ___________________________________

greger-Sigma-35-mm-1.4-Art-april-041
Some people living on a house boat -Fredrikstad.

greger-Sigma-35-mm-1.4-Art-april-055
Sad looking Tivoli in the rain. Almost no people visiting. f2,2  ISO 100, 1/320sec. Sigma 35 Art.

greger-Sigma-35-mm-1.4-Art-april-038

greger-Sigma-35-mm-1.4-Art-april-037

greger-Sigma-35-mm-1.4-Art-april-035

greger-Sigma-35-mm-1.4-Art-april-034

greger-Sigma-35-mm-1.4-Art-april-033

greger-Sigma-35-mm-1.4-Art-april-032

greger-Sigma-35-mm-1.4-Art-april-028

ulf-greger-Sigma-35-mm-1.4-Art--Canon-5D-2013-april-0008Bad panning attempt. Sigma 35 1.4 Art. I failed, not the lens 🙂

Still want an Carl Zeiss Makro Planar 100 – so should get rid of one of the 35’s. This is not a Sigma VS Carl Zeiss test. They are too different since the Zeiss Distagon 35 dont have autofocus and is f2 max and the Sigma is f1.4 wide open. ( Both are f16 minimum) So this is just a small comparison of the two lenses. I like 35mm on fullframe but dont want to own two of them. I had the Canon 35 L but sold it because the Carl Zeiss 35’s image quality outperformed it.

____________________________________ Carl Zeiss________________________________

ulf-greger-Carl-Zeiss-Distagon-Canon-5D-2013-april-0093

ulf-greger-Carl-Zeiss-Distagon-Canon-5D-2013-april-0096

ulf-greger-Carl-Zeiss-Distagon-Canon-5D-2013-april-0094

ulf-greger-Carl-Zeiss-Distagon-Canon-5D-2013-april-0091

sigma-and-zeiss2

Also visit me on

All pictures is Copyright © Ulf Greger.